Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG

File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG

•  Info all by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Halavar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The place is charming --LivioAndronico talk 23:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The place is certainly charming but we are assessing images, not places. There’s severe chromatic aberration on this one (visible e.g. in the rocks on the left, or the dark ribbons on the yurts), and large parts of the roofs are blown. This is not sufficient on an 8 mpix FPC. Not even QI for me, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 11:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

• Kreuzschnabel here isn't QI i see other,like a observatory and don't the door of the observatory is for me out of nomination...--LivioAndronico talk 14:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

• I am quite aware that this is not QI but I want to see a reasonable technical quality on an FPC as well, sorry. Anything technical flaws to mention on my part of an observatory? --Kreuzschnabel 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

• Sorry Kreuzschnabel I am very sorry . I definitely wrong to express myself. I just wanted to make a comparison, to make you understand, about what I see as possible FP. I still I have not voted against at you .--LivioAndronico talk 16:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

• Feel free to oppose my nominations if you think they are not featurable. This is not a personal thing for me at all, like "I dont vote against you, so please do you not vote against me" – I judge images here, neither places, nominators or photographers. Whenever I think a nomination doesn’t meet FP standards, I oppose without regarding the author, nominator or other votes. --Kreuzschnabel 16:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support -- Jiel (talk) 17:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)