Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese maple at Shitennō-ji Honbō Garden in Osaka, November 2015 - Stacking - ProPhotoRGB.jpg

File:Japanese maple at Shitennō-ji Honbō Garden in Osaka, November 2015 - Stacking - ProPhotoRGB.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2016 at 17:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese maple at Shitennō-ji Honbō Garden in Osaka, November 2015 - Stacking - ProPhotoRGB.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese maple at Shitennō-ji Honbō Garden in Osaka, November 2015 - Stacking - ProPhotoRGB.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info created by Laitche - uploaded by Laitche - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 17:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pine^✉ 17:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you, Pine :) --Laitche (talk) 17:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice artistic composition and idea, but first of all the red leaves lack any kind of structure. It is weird. They look blown in the red channel for the eye, but in the histogram there is no clipping. Moreover, the jpg file uses an embedded ProPhotoRGB color profile. Now, this may be an adequate choise in some professional physical print applications, as it is a wider color space, but for web use, it should be sRGB, as many browsers cannot interprete the ProPhotoRGB color profile correctly, even with a color calibrated monitor, see User:Colin/BrowserTest for an example. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

• Long time no see and thanks Slaunger, yes I know color space matter and red channel thing, I don't know why but when use sRGB color space (see other versions) the red color had faded so I uploaded this one. Thanks again Pine, I like this red but I think this one is not FP, a bit too drak so please withdraw this :) --Laitche (talk) 03:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - There was another instance in which it was pointed out that the photographer has the option of withdrawing a nomination of his/her photo by someone else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks, Laitche. Nice to interact with you again! Weird what is causing you problems in the sRGB version. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

• P.S. Slaunger, I already brought up color space matter here eight years ago since Colin was not here yet... ;) --Laitche (talk) 21:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

• Haha, I did not know that Laitche. Thanks for this historical insight. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice image and nice attempt of composition with the light coming from the other direction however the red color is a bit too much clipped for my tastes. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 00:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Slaunger's critiques of the composition (it is just too random and cluttered for me ... perhaps cropping in on part of it might have gotten us somewhere) and Christian's point about the red color being too overdone. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)