Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Júlio Prestes Station in São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

File:Júlio Prestes Station in São Paulo, Brazil.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2016 at 11:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Júlio Prestes Station in São Paulo, Brazil.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Júlio Prestes Station in São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
•  Info All by -- The Photographer 11:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - The sky could be denoised a bit more, and there are also some dust spots you didn't fix, for example on either side of the flag, to the right of the top floor of the tower below the clock and at least four to the extreme right of and a bit higher than the clock. The focus on the building is a bit soft, maybe because of the pollution haze that you've mentioned (if I remember correctly) is always in the air in Sao Paulo. I won't pass judgment on the photo now because I'd like to see the results of whatever revisions you may make. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:39, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Excellent review. This picture was taken using tripod, I can't underestand why the focus is soft (maybe the pollution problem). I will fix each of your nice recomendations, thanks ! --The Photographer 16:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose The light is good, it is framed well. I trust the dust spots will be fixed, so I will disregard this for a moment. I think it is sufficiently sharp. Exposure control is good. However, it does not wow me at all, I am afraid. To be frank I find the composition boring. The cropped statue on the LHS does not help.Sorry. -- Slaunger (talk) 17:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments, I uploaded another version trying fix the problems commented by you. Slaunger and Ikan Kekek. Please, let me know what do you think and Slaunger, I underestand, you don't need change your vote --The Photographer 21:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

It is better with the dust spots fixed, but I does not change the overall impression; and thanks for accepting that ;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I will have to disagree with Slaunger on this one. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Still seems to me to have a dark halo. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Slaunger. lNeverCry 05:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
• Mild  Support - Much better. The main thing that gives me pause is the crop of the statue. Otherwise, I like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I was looking with Beria the best point of view to show the complete structure as possible, however, there is a tree that has grown disproportionately and I preferred cut. Perhaps in the future go back and look elsewhere, this time without a tripod. --The Photographer 10:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is a QI for sure but it holds no wow or me at all. It is also a bit "heavy" on the left side so it seems to be leaning/tilted to that side much more than it actually does (some of the vertical lines are leaning that way) and this is unfortunately underlined by the parked taxi car (with the almost rude licence plate...^^), plus there are traces of CA in several places on the building. Sorry. cart-Talk 09:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Interesting your remark about the licence plate, lol --The Photographer 12:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per others. And clear perspective distortion: See left vertical lines of the picture. The streetlight of the right is not an adequate reference--Lmbuga (talk) 18:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the remarks and votes positives or not. --The Photographer 23:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 01:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)