Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Intern of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg

File:Intern of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2015 at 10:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Intern of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Intern of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg

•  Info All by -- LivioAndronico talk 10:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico talk 10:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Clearly better than your other church shots, but still little wow overall. Not tack sharp, and some lack of details. And again, the bar is pretty high on the subject. There's a "stitching" error on the upper corner you might want to fix. - Benh (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for info. I don't think in this way,but accept your opinion. --LivioAndronico talk 23:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Is this a single exposure? If so, well done. Light and colours and overall quality is good. Exposure control could be better, and it is noticeable that there is a slight deviation from symmetry in the vantage point (follow the suspension chain of the chandelier). Neutral because church interior bar is very high. Still, definitely a shot to be proud of. -- Slaunger (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

• Yes Slaunger is a single exposure.Thanks.--LivioAndronico talk 08:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Benh, a good photo of a interesting church, but not an outstanding one. --DXR (talk) 10:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Benh, and I have to say that if I had voted in some of your former nominations I'd have opposed. Your other current FPC offers, on the other side, thanks to the lighting the special ingredient we expect in Commons for our finest pictures. This one doesn't. Poco² 08:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• Even I could do it Poco², but I have been so 'polite enough not to say, do not like to be theatrical, but many here like to be. So today I will behave the same way.--LivioAndronico talk 09:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
• Incluso yo podía hacer tan Poco², pero estaba lo suficientemente cortés no quiere decir, que no me gusta ser teatral, pero muchos aquí gustaría ser. Así que hoy me comporto igual modo.--LivioAndronico talk 09:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• I didn't get your point, you can try it in Italian, if you like Poco² 09:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• Ok, you mean that sometimes you believe that if you would have to vote all nominations many of them you would oppose, but you just opt not to participate. And from now on you will refrain from abstaining and always vote if you think it is not a FP, as you just did in one of my nominations. I have no problem with that as long as you are consistent and don't focus on certain people. In regards to me, I rarely have time to vote over all open FPCs but I did it today (as you can see in my contributions), at least for those where I believe to have enough competence to judge whether it is a FP or not (illustrations or paintings are not the case). Poco² 10:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• No te preocupes, yo también tengo la experiencia--LivioAndronico talk 10:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose --A.Savin 16:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Clear canvassing. This silly egocentric behaviour by "Livioandronico2013" is just ridiculous. --A.Savin 22:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

The only thing ridiculous is that you are an administrator --LivioAndronico talk 23:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Not a first time. And yes it gets ridiculous. Nothing seems to forbid that but just imagine that everyone behaves the same way... Would have been easy for me to ask a support vote in my last nom (it failed for a single support) and to get it. - Benh (talk) 04:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Is ridiculous that people come here only and only to oppose only my photos, but this is not said and not stressed ... There are some people horrendous here ,but luckily they are only 4 --LivioAndronico talk 07:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Not less ridiculous than if people come here only and only to support (you surely have been summoned here via e-mail, ComputerHotline?), despite the fact that the picture - while being more than sufficient for QI - obviously isn't amongst the finest of Commons. Thanks for further personal offenses Livioandronico2013, I rarely saw more childish behaviour. --A.Savin 09:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

• I can't believe it, but looks like you're actually right. It's really not encouraging people to stay. Hope we don't have to play NSA in the future... - Benh (talk) 17:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Aha, I am horrendous because I voted against this picture. If we had been 6 people, than we would have 6 horrendous people in the project. You are allowing yourselft too much. And public canvassing on top of it. I just requested a disciplinary measure to this unacceptable behaviour. Poco² 10:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but I was in Castel Gandolfo to make my bad foto.No Poco², sorry I expressed myself in the wrong place, I did not mean you, DXR or Benh (with DXR plus I a very good relationship), I spoke in general is a case then the opposition was 4, I did not realize, sorry.I spoke for example of those childish and vindictive administrator of A.Savin(block me,don't worry) that connects puts two negative votes only and only at 2 my photos and disappears, even a negative vote without even motivate !!!--LivioAndronico talk 14:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Please, Livio, the world is better without offensive attacks. If my vote stirs controversy, I remove it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry,I understand 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)--LivioAndronico talk 15:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@LivioAndronico: keep always smile. All opposes are for me suggestions to make my images in the future better. Take it easy, because we all are here a big "commons family". --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment There are three stitching errors. I added the image notes. --Laitche (talk) 13:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Done Alchemist-hp ,Thanks Laitche --LivioAndronico talk 15:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • The two of those at the center part were fixed but a little weird waves appeared instead, and the rest at the left side is still not fixed. --Laitche (talk) 20:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, a QI. If the subject had great wow or the image quality was perfect, I'd overlook some 1px stitching errors. But the image quality isn't at FP level, with softness and lack of detail probably due to aggressive NR and too much local contrast applied. -- Colin (talk) 17:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Eh? It looks there are two vertical edges at the left side of the pillar, likes Trompe-l'œil???, Image note. --Laitche (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Probably my misjudgement. --Laitche (talk) 13:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)