Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of Hallwyl House - Great Drawing Room DSC7306 - edited.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Interior of Hallwyl House - Great Drawing Room DSC7306 - edited.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2021 at 13:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Sweden
Info Panorama of the Great Drawing Room in the Hallwyl House, created and uploaded by Rainer Halama - edited/tweaked and nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 13:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Support There are always controversies regarding winning photos of WLM, and this image was my "WHAT??"-moment. When I first saw this at Swedish WLM this year, I thought for sure it was going to win, given that we don't have many interiors like this and next to no interior panoramas at all of old Swedish buildings. But the jury totally snubbed this. (Grumble...) I put a few finishing touches on it to suit the FPC better and uploaded it as a separate file. -- Cart (talk) 13:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Oppose For me it is distorted and full of noise,sorry --Commonists 15:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Question This isn't a 3D photo? It looks like it should be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- No, AFAICS it's just a panorama, not 3D. --Cart (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Thanks. I just find the distortion too great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Info I feel flattered that this image has been nominated. I am aware of the issue of distortion in panoramas. I still prefer them to 3-D images, because they can be viewed straight without a viewer. I intentionally drew out the distortation to the end of the walls on either side, because, standing with the back to the fourth wall this was the only way to take in the whole room with my 12mm (18mm, 35mm-equivalent) lens, held vertical. This is the perceived field of vision, when you are standing at this point. Of course you move your eyes from left to right and back again at that moment. But this is what your mind puts together in your head when standing there. --Rainer Halama (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm usually one of those who objects to distorted images out in the open, but that is because we can't be sure or know, if a road/river/shoreline is bent or actually straight in reality. Here the distortion doesn't bother me at all, because it's easy for us to percive this room as rectangular despite being 'folded out' in this way. The photo has great EV (educational value) and you can pick out all the lavish details in it, and I think the sheer size of the image makes up for any noise in dark corners. --Cart (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support I like it. --Gnosis (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Weak oppose While I agree with Cart's defense of the appearance of the image, and Rainer's point about how unlike the many 360-degree images we've seen here and promoted this does not require a special viewer, I still find the appearance of the some of the corners unrealistic. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Normally I am not a fan of ‘curved’ panoramas (nor of 360°-images), but this one feels really consistent and attractive. --Aristeas (talk) 06:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose This motif need a full spherical panoramic view (360x180°) --Milseburg (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Distorted, but still good IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Although distorted, I still like this image.--Vulphere 05:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Daniel Case RolfHill (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
