Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inspiration4 Launch (210915-F-CG053-1003).jpg

File:Inspiration4 Launch (210915-F-CG053-1003).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Inspiration4 Launch (210915-F-CG053-1003).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inspiration4 Launch (210915-F-CG053-1003).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Others
•  Info created by Staff Sgt. JT Armstrong - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by MarioJump83 -- MarioJump83! 12:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- MarioJump83! 12:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --BugWarp (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are a lot of dust spots. This might be under Astrophotography program - maybe, but i dont resolve between many burned pixles, stars and dead pixles and some whith blurred track. Above all uncalibrated color space. All could be corrected, to become FP. Otherwise scenic view. --Mile (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Stars make traces at this exposure time. So, every sharp dot here is a hot pixel. The dark spots are dust on the sensor. Altogether too many for me. --Kreuzschnabel 08:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The colors don't display well on my screen. Also, heavy blacks, the image is too contrasted. Buildings leaning in -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Certainly has wow, but the building on the right looks odd and I don't love the red lens flare. I'm also seeing numerous dust spots, as mentioned by Mile above, and they tip my vote to opposing. Good for a VIC nom if nothing else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Verticals straightened

•  Oppose The image is literally "lying" about the launch angle. Get the verticals straight (at the further expense of quality), and presto! it’s going off vertically. --Kreuzschnabel 08:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks. I rescind my comment about VIC. Your version should be the nominee there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Wow factor is enough for me to ignore the technical shortcomings, but the scientific misunderstanding it offers from launch angle is unpleasant. --IamMM (talk) 12:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral pending straightening the trajectory out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)