Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:InsidecatedralAngels.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:InsidecatedralAngels.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2022 at 16:37:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Dasfour2022 - nominated by ArionEstar -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support Optical quality could be better but I really like the composition and the colors. -- Wolf im Wald 19:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Guess I should have tried using my cell phone. Might have been better. These days cells phones are awesome but at that time, I only had a poor quality cell phone. But thanks for noticing my photo. At least it was judged. Though the cross and podium are straight according to the horizon. Not sure what caused the curved wall in the background to photograph like that. I will return to reshoot the photo one day to see how I can improve on it. Maybe next year I will submit a better photo. Dasfour2022 (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The image quality is borderline but the motif is great, however it is clearly tilted and the crop is off-centre. Will support if someone improves that Cmao20 (talk) 11:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I used the cross to set the horizon. The circular wall can be a bit deceiving. The podium too is horizontally correct. Dasfour2022 (talk) 12:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose At a first glance, I could easily tell that this is off-centre. Not FP nor QI to me, sorry. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I used the cross to set the horizon. The circular wall can be a bit deceiving. The podium too is horizontally correct. Dasfour2022 (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. In addition, it's blurred a lot at the top. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I couldnt afford a really expensive wide angle lens that would all the edges of a photo to be sharp. They cost thousands of dollars. Dasfour2022 (talk) 12:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs work. Subject has the wow factor, but it's tilted and off centred. I'd encourage the artist to fix it and try again. --Fernando (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I used the cross to set the horizon. The circular wall can be a bit deceiving. The podium too is horizontally correct. If I reset the horizon then the cross is off kilter as well as the podium. What am I to do? Dasfour2022 (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support I kind of feel the composition makes it look dynamic. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp at top, and distorted on sides. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Shot with a 17mm lens. Imposible to have focus in all edges of the photo. A cell phone might give you that but the wide angle lens I used obviously did not give focus on the edges. Had i used a very expesive lens it might have been in focus but I can't afford thousnds of dollars for one. Dasfour2022 (talk) 12:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)