Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Immaculate Conception Church, Farm Street, London, UK - Diliff.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Immaculate Conception Church, Farm Street, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2014 at 20:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by User:Diliff - uploaded by User:Diliff - nominated by User:Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Diliff (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)- Support--ArildV (talk) 11:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 19:43, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Baresi F (talk) 20:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 06:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Sanyambahga (talk) 20:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --P e z i (talk) 22:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- It is a picture very beautiful, very good exhibition, and very good color harmony and you line. It is a very guessed right image.
Es una fotografia muy hermosa, muy buena exposición, y muy buena armonia de color y lineas. Es una imagen muy acertada. --Rsantiaguez
- Support The more I look on your church interior shots the more I loose the interest to try good interior shots myself and nominate them here because you set the "benchmark" such high :) Keep on the great work. --Tuxyso (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- I know you are perhaps talking in jest, but this is a curse of FP -- that the benchmark in some areas is so high we actually stop taking/uploading photographs if we can't compete. And this would be a shame for this particular topic, as many buildings are "at risk" and their beautiful structure and interiors disappear. I think capturing a high quality photo of them along with a free licence is a pretty worthy endeavour, whether one merely manages a single frame or a multi-frame HDR. -- Colin (talk) 07:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, in addition to what Colin said, I'm sure you're capable of achieving similar results. You were inquiring about getting a panoramic head recently. That's really the one physical tool that makes these high resolution images possible. Apart from that, it's just a matter of spending time on the photography. You need to spend around 5-10 minutes taking the individual component images (sometimes much more if you have to wait for people to move out of the shot!), and then in the region of 30 to 60 minutes processing and stitching them. So yes, it's not the sort of work that results in a high volume of uploads, but I tend to prefer quality over quantity. Valuable as every image uploaded to Common has the potential to be, I generally don't bother to take a photo unless I expect that it will be one of the best of its kind available, and particularly with a free licence as Colin mentioned. Diliff (talk) 10:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment Too late, but anyhow: outstanding! Poco2 12:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Too late for me too. Excellent, I want learn how to do this kind of picture. Leave EXIF information could help. Excellent art work and excellent picture representation --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors
