Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 01.jpg

File:Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2016 at 22:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Bernard Gagnon - uploaded by David C. S. - nominated by David C. S. -- David C. S. 22:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- David C. S. 22:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The building at right and the flag at left really crowd the church. The image looks quite cluttered. INeverCry 00:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per INeverCry. --Code (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per INC, and for the same reason, this probably wouldn't pass at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per INC, it is always a good practice to nominate pictures for QIC and see if it passes that first. cart-Talk 08:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per INC ~ Moheen ^(talk) 09:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per INC. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. The flag hiding part of the subject, distracting in-leaning buildings at the sides, cut-off cars at the bottom, unbalanced lighting. Sorry for putting it so bluntly but this does not rise above a tourist shot in my eyes. --Kreuzschnabel 06:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: there is too much opposition, per the comments above

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 20:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)