Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia católica, Beaver Creek, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-25, DD 13.jpg

File:Iglesia católica, Beaver Creek, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-25, DD 13.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2018 at 19:31:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia católica, Beaver Creek, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-25, DD 13.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia católica, Beaver Creek, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-25, DD 13.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Catholic church of Our Lady of Grace, Beaver Creek, Yukon, Canada. This original small church belongs to the Diocese of Whitehorse and was built by Father Morriset in 1962 using a Butler hut (a redesign of the famous Quonset hut) left by the US Army after construction of the Alaska Highway was completed. The church is located in an area with a very low population density and Beaver Creek, the last populated place in Canada before Alaska, has a population of 93 (2016). All by me, Poco² 19:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 19:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special for FP, good image but no wow. --Karelj (talk) 21:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
• Weak  Support I'm not sure, but IMO the shadows are a little bit disturbing. But I like the composition. --XRay ^talk 05:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Karelj.--Peulle (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not loving the composition, especially the trees cut on top, and I find the image too busy -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others; I can see what might have been but this just doesn't work for so many reasons, mainly the composition and colors. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment @Karelj, XRay, ParadiseDesertOasis8888, Peulle, and Basile Morin: , Daniel Case: I reduced the shadows, cropped a bit on the left to improve the composition and "cooled" it a bit. --Poco² 11:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment IMO still OK. And I like the composition. --XRay ^talk 12:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Not much difference for me, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I'm surprised by how big a difference the cropping made. This composition is harmonious to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Looking at it again today, I think I see better where the problem is. The very high crop, much higher than the church and the bell, seems to have this purpose : include the tall trees. Unfortunately, those tall trees are cut on top, which makes the composition awkward (in my view) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Poco² 12:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)