Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoverfly cockade stack-20190809-RM-064310.jpg

File:Hoverfly cockade stack-20190809-RM-064310.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2020 at 23:43:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hoverfly cockade stack-20190809-RM-064310.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoverfly cockade stack-20190809-RM-064310.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family : Syrphidae (Hoverflies)
•  Info Hoverfly on the unopened blossom of a cockade.Focus stack of 15 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! I can not imagine that it could be better. -- Spurzem (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Great one again. Cmao20 (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - That was on my list of files to nominate, too. I've gotten behind on my nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support excellent! --Ivar (talk) 10:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others. --Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support You are really getting the hang of this. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Killarnee (T•R•P) 17:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Wow Poco a poco (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Simply excellent, btw Topaz can improve it too :) --Wilfredor (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Wilfredor: The program is good but the question is whether this is necessary in this case. The image result is actually a little better, but the overall impression does not change at all. I don't find the result overwhelming in relation to the time and also financial expenditure, but I will try a little more. How much is your commission? ;-) --Ermell (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Ermell I do not receive any commission for promoting this software, however, I must accept that I have become a fan of such programs :) your photo is spectacular and you don't need any of those tricks and gadgets to improve it --Wilfredor (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

• I wasn't serious about that, but you deserved it. I have tested it and am convinced of it now because it is good and helpful. Thanks for the hint.--Ermell (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Another Ermell's shot that discourages me from trying to do macro myself :) --Podzemnik (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Really well done Ermell apart from two antennae (see note). Easy to rectify. Charles (talk) 12:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Thank God you know your way around. Thanks for the advice.--Ermell (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Charles (talk) 11:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Slam-dunk support Daniel Case (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family : Syrphidae (Hoverflies)