Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 06.jpg

File:Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 06.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2018 at 08:23:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 06.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 06.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects # Switserland Sawing machine, detail.
•  Info Water-powered Sawmill, Sagi Tschiertschen. Built c 1920. sawing machine. Detail. The color and atmosphere of this photo evokes memory memories from the fifties of the last century. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 08:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 08:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - When I saw the thumbnail, I didn't expect to support this picture, but at full screen, it's a really good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Lines intersecting with crop in just the right way makes it work very well. --cart-Talk 10:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Two other images of the same series of this sawmill are already featured. I see no need to have one more. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image. The other two images Uoaei1 refers to are of totally different parts of the sawmill. Saying this one can't be an FP is like saying "we have two FPs of different parts of this same French church, so we can't have another". I have no problem with this current FPC being an FP at all. It's an excellent image and deserves FP status. Just my two cents. PumpkinSky talk 12:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Uoaei1. It isn't like "different parts of the same church". It's the same saw, just from different angles. So it is more like different views of the alter, taken on the same day with the same light and same processing. I also don't think it is fair-play to nominate in this way without declaring the previous noms. FP is about "finest", which includes choosing from one's own shots of the same object. -- Colin (talk) 13:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan and cart. Daniel Case (talk) 13:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose One of those pics where I think the perspective (vanishing points) doesn't fit. And not sure what is so remarkable about it to start with. - Benh (talk) 20:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan and Cart HalfGig talk 01:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 13:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Colin. The composition isn't bad but it is pretty typical and unremarkable. dllu (t,c) 03:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I find this picture awesome. The composition is excellent, and I love the mirror effect of the saw -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I can appreciate not wanting to promote another image of the same object, but it seems sufficiently different to me and if we were only allowed two of the subject, this would be one of the two. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  04:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 17:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines