Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Trinity Sloane Street Church Nave 2 - Diliff.jpg

File:Holy Trinity Sloane Street Church Nave 2 - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2014 at 15:22:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Trinity Sloane Street Church Nave 2 - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Trinity Sloane Street Church Nave 2 - Diliff.jpg

•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Diliff (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support High quality and EV.--ArildV (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Arcalino (talk) 18:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 09:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Halavar (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I think that the subject is not as spectacular as others, but the execution is top Poco² 18:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support—and from an atheist, no less. Color, composition, everything. :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 04:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I'm an atheist too, and yet the majority of the images I've uploaded recently have been church interiors. You don't have to be religious to appreciate the architectural aesthetics of churches. :-) Diliff (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Well said. :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 08:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kasir (talk) 08:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Extended content

@Blurred Lines: Don't use revert to close a nomination when the time is over. You made a mistake that I corrected and talked to you gently. But your behavior is rather rude. First learns what are the purposes of the revert tool. Second, let the bot to close the nominations first. Give enough time to confirmation so that bot will permanently close it in its next run after 8 more hours. Jee 15:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC) First, to let you know Mr. Jee, I do not have rollback permission, so to tell me to learn about reverting is a pity thing to say to a experienced user. Second, I have told you several times that it has been 5 days, and since then there has no been opposes, and that's why I have speedy promoted it. I don't know what your problem is with speedy promotions, but please do not bark at me like a dog because I couldn't concentrate on the time, minding the date instead, as of which in the rules it does not state any of what you are trying to say to me. —Blurred Lines 16:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Hope you understand why I barked :) Jee 17:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Oy. —Blurred Lines 17:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 23:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors