Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hibiscus P1230969.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Hibiscus P1230969.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2019 at 16:51:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales
- Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not bad, but nothing outstanding for FP. The resolution is not impressive. The size of the flower is not obvious. The location is not provided (as usual). --A.Savin 21:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support It's a solid QI and I think it just about crosses the bar for me, but A.Savin's criticisms are correct. Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow for me, uninteresting lighting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. The light is kind of harsh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Provide the location, and I might support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice picture and a nice flower, but doesn't seem like FP. A lot of noise and the composition doesn't quite work for me (with the wood in the background on only one side and the flower slightly off center -- doesn't quite seem right for the proportions). — Rhododendrites talk | 02:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others --Boothsift 03:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Pro: subject centered nicely within a square, subdued colours, and slanted illumination. Con: too much chromatic noise and weak image sharpness. --Franz van Duns (talk) 17:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Vulphere 04:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results: