Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harris & Ewing - Helena Hill Weed.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Harris & Ewing - Helena Hill Weed.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2020 at 17:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Harris & Ewing - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment Is it allowed to have something like a watermark on it?--Augustgeyler (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- For historic images, yes. The prohibition isn't meant to rewrite photographic history, just to keep people from adding a credit on their newly-taken photo. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment What is with eyes ? One more light than other. Watermark is part of history here, should stay. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose the skin texture detail has been completely erased, worst parts are below the eyes and the arm.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- That's film grain. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose --Mosbatho (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Mosbatho, you have to give a reason for opposing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women
