Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hammarby Sjöstad January 2015.jpg

File:Hammarby Sjöstad January 2015.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2015 at 08:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hammarby Sjöstad January 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hammarby Sjöstad January 2015.jpg

•  Info Panorama of Hammarby sjöstad, Stockholm. A former mainly industrial zone, undergoing major urban redevelopment. The picture was taken about 20 minutes after sunset. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 08:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support but could you add the camera position? --Code (talk) 10:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

@Code: Sorry I forgot.  Done now.--ArildV (talk) 12:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

• Weak  Support: Nice light and scene, though with visible camera shake. Ok I guess due to high resolution. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

@Julian Herzog: Its hand held. I just walked past when I saw the reflection in the water (I had the camera, but no tripod with me). Most of the water is covered by ice (with a thin layer of water on top), which creates the strong reflections. I took the photo yesterday, and today is the most ice is gone (because of strong wind and mild weather). So it is not possible to take another images.--ArildV (talk) 12:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support  ■ MMXX ^talk 20:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neither quality (a bit blurred, but due to the high res neglectable), nor composition (a lot of empty space at the left, no clear compositional idea, no eye-catcher), nor motive (imho some not really remarkable average buildings on the water making some reflections) do convince me. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice lighting. Maybe this can be brightened a bit. The shake is unfortunate but OK per Julian. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose A FP cannot be unsharp, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jebulon, I'm afraid --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Slight motion blur, per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Water surface tilt to the right, D kuba (talk) 09:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 06:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)