Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hain Eiche Herbst 121696.jpg

File:Hain Eiche Herbst 121696.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2020 at 22:07:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hain Eiche Herbst 121696.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hain Eiche Herbst 121696.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
•  Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -Seven Pandas (talk) 00:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 06:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Adámoz (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the combination of the contre-jour tree with its shadow. --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 10:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Info Gallery fixed. The easiest way to get the spelling of the section right is to go to the actual gallery page and copy the section heading to the nom. --Cart (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support} --Milseburg (talk) 16:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not sure about the effect due to the lack of perspective correction but the compo, subject and ligthing are really nice Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Sorry, I don't see what the wow is here. It's a nice photo, but it's just a normal tree. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kestreltail. —kallerna (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose strong perspective distortion on the sides and a bit overprocessed (lack of details). --Ivar (talk) 05:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ivar.--Peulle (talk) 06:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Percival. --El Grafo (talk) 10:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose At first it looks just great, but when you open it and really look at it, the distortion is too much, sorry. --Cart (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I don't know ... I've seen worse distortion at the edges of other FPs we've promoted. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very good composition, beautiful colors, good lighting -- Spurzem (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

 Comment I always find it bad when a picture is blown up because a few people miss the "wow". If you asked them what they mean by "wow", they probably couldn't say it. Why don't they just vote neutral or say nothing? -- Spurzem (talk) 10:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

That's exactly what I tend to do. "Wow" is such a subjective criterion that it's meaningless . --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae