Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haßberge Scheune 5153908.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Haßberge Scheune 5153908.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Feb 2017 at 19:31:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany
- Info created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Basotxerri -- Basotxerri (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Some weeks ago on QI. I like this colourful image and I hope that six or seven more persons like it, too... --Basotxerri (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Really nice! --cart-Talk 21:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 06:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral The town where I come 90 % of the houses look like this, I'm only explaining why it's not wow for me. --The Photographer 10:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Most of the building is hidden and if that was intentional, the idea doesn't work for me. Charles (talk) 11:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It was the "yin and yang" pattern of the green and yellow around the building that struck me as significant. This is the sort of photo where you can choose to see the center or the surroundings. --cart-Talk 12:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support very good image! Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - With blocks of almost solid color, I don't find that this picture is really that rewarding to move my eye around (you could think of it this way: it lacks the linear arabesque that I like to see in 2D static visual art, which gives it a feeling of dynamism). That said, if the yellow flowers were only beyond the house, I think the pure visual impact of that division would cause the photo to merit a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I like it. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 21:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 01:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany