Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Greven, Fuestrup, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal, Alte Fahrt, Sicherheitssperrtor -- 2021 -- 3918.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Greven, Fuestrup, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal, Alte Fahrt, Sicherheitssperrtor -- 2021 -- 3918.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2021 at 04:46:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 04:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support You had a really good eye for composition with this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support The beauty of transience :) -- Radomianin (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Metal too rusted. -- Karelj (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I've seen a lot of reasons to give a contra vote, but this one I haven't seen. What do you think I can do to reduce the rust? What should I do with historical machines? Please come back to good reviews and reasons. --XRay 💬 01:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- No, you should not reduce the rust, but you should not nominate this horrible image for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I would like to ask you to refrain from personal attacks.--XRay 💬 15:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have no idea, what you are talking about. I was writing about your horrible image, but no any word about your person and related personal attack... -- Karelj (talk) 16:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion, "horrible" is a disrespectful term in connection with a nomination. --XRay 💬 17:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- BTW: Everyone may have their own opinion about the pictures. Tastes are different. In my opinion, a review should also be helpful. And I personally don't rate pictures that I don't like, either. But everyone has to know that for themselves. --XRay 💬 17:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have no idea, what you are talking about. I was writing about your horrible image, but no any word about your person and related personal attack... -- Karelj (talk) 16:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I would like to ask you to refrain from personal attacks.--XRay 💬 15:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- No, you should not reduce the rust, but you should not nominate this horrible image for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I haven't yet decided how to vote (on the basis of composition/overall impression), but I'm puzzled by this oppose. The rust definitely enhances rather than detracts from the image IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I've seen a lot of reasons to give a contra vote, but this one I haven't seen. What do you think I can do to reduce the rust? What should I do with historical machines? Please come back to good reviews and reasons. --XRay 💬 01:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, 'too rusted' is a puzzling reason for an oppose, but how can you give a rational oppose reason for this sort of nomination? As I've said before, 'I don't like it' should be allowed for artistic-type nominations. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I think "Not an interesting subject" is probably a defensible oppose rationale. It could get pushback, but it's a reasonable point of view, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I you don't like it, that quite obviously means that you are not WOW-ed by it. Perfectly good reason to oppose for any kind of picture, not only artsy ones. --El Grafo (talk) 06:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support I like the charm of decay. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 22:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support I would have liked the teeth of the sprocket a little sharper. But I think the blur was a conscious choice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 03:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 06:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines