Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpg

File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#United_States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg - uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Different. Unique subject and lighting. I only wish that the bolts on the sides of the main tube were in focus too but still interesting enough to me. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 04:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I don’t like the flanges being cut off. A slightly wider framing would look much better IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 08:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Unfortunately, a wider framing would not work, as it would add disturbing elements to the picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Found a way to deal with this. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

• Weak  Support due to the poor DoF, the composition does work for me + the item is original Poco² 10:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Definitely agree with Kreuzschnabel. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support I like the image and the subject appeals to me, but I agree with Kreuzschnabel that a wider framing would be better. Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. —kallerna (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others -- Karelj (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Info Kreuzschnabel, Kallerna, Draceane, Uoaei1, Karelj, Daniel Case: I reprocessed the image and applied a wider crop. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment You rather replaced it by a different image, making all previous votes questionable. I don’t approve of such alterations during voting period. --Kreuzschnabel 20:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination I reverted my change and withdraw. I think I need a break. Thanks for all the feedback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Kreuzschnabel, yes, I think you're right. That wasn't my intention. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)