Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden Gate YNP1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Golden Gate YNP1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2016 at 01:58:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Golden Gate Canyon In Yellowstone National Park, with a storm developing over Mammoth Hot Springs in the distance, all by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)- Support - Breathtaking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment Great picture compositionally but unfortunately the noise reduction and the saturation of the sky both seem to be far overdone. Maybe fixable. --Code (talk) 05:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)- Comment The composition with the motif is great but the overall technical quality seems to be questionable. The saturated sky looks a bit unnatural considering the lightning of the cliff on the left side. It is also evident that there is chromatic aberration on some trees, while the mountain on the right leaves me with the impression that it might have been painted. I think most of these issues can be fixed.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment A version taken straight from the RAW file can be seen here File:Golden Gate YNP2.jpg, with only exposure and contrast adjusted, white-balanced for daylight but no saturation or vibrance adjustments. NR is less and there is a touch less saturation that reflects the native RAW image (both saturation and vibrance are at 0): the image is a few years old and camera and lens are retired due to noise and a tendency to CA. For color, note that this is at 2200m altitude so there is little or no haze, and that Yellowstone and Golden Gate Canyon are so named for a reason, the rhyolite is startlingly yellow in places. Acroterion (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- The other version has still to much noise reduction applied. I suppose you upload a version without any noise reduction at all. I don't think noise reduction is really necessary in this case. --Code (talk) 04:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Take a look at File:Golden Gate YNP3.jpg, no NR. I think it's a little rough in the sky for my taste. Acroterion (talk) 01:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good composition. IMO minor technical problems. Sharpness could be better. May be better if reprocessed from the RAW file.--XRay talk 05:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Strong support A little distorted and unsharp near the corners, but otherwise perfect. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per Code.--Jebulon (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
