Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Giant anteater at MAV-USP.jpg

File:Giant anteater at MAV-USP.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 19:43:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Giant anteater at MAV-USP.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Giant anteater at MAV-USP.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
•  Info edited by Rodrigo.Argenton - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by Rodrigo.Argenton -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 19:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 19:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Interesting, and high EV. However I think there is too much contrast/light compared to the original version. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose: The black support pole visually cutting off one foot should have been avoided. Also I'm not a fan of the typography on the scale (very condensed font and there should be a space between number and unit symbol). – Lucas 22:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree, that black pole should have been avoided. --@Boothsift 02:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

@Lucasbosch and Boothsift: you are both requesting something impossible. The pole holds the whole body, there is a reason why is so close to the legs... the sustainability.

@Yann: the background is more clear, and the bone is more close to the reality, that said, I can bring down the brightness. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 03:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Joalpe (talk) 18:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • This support vote was canvassed. See Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#Voting issues with Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton and Joalpe -- Colin (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Prove it. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 20:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• It was proven to my satisfaction. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I understand about the black pole but otherwise this is just not up to the standards of other animal-skeleton-on-black-background pics we've promoted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2019 (UTC)