Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gazeta - Entrada de una finca 01.jpg

File:Gazeta - Entrada de una finca 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2017 at 19:05:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gazeta - Entrada de una finca 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gazeta - Entrada de una finca 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Spain
•  Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 19:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 19:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - This is a case in which I think a feeling of frustration at not seeing the rest of the ivy that extends past the picture frame on the lower left is actually good for the composition, which has so much motion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special to me in this composition, sorry Jiel (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Works because of the texture and colors. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose the quality of the picture is evident, but imho the scene is not spectacular because the shrub covers a quite low wall. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great quality, and I see potential here but I'm not convinced, the bottom crop is disturbing as you just missed the tip of that ivy branch, otherwise I cannot say how to improve it, but it isn't wowing to me. Poco² 11:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Poco a poco, Johann Jaritz, and Ikan Kekek:  Done I've removed the end of the branch, is it better this way? --Basotxerri (talk) 18:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

• That was an improvement but still I don't feel this is one of our finest, sorry, Poco² 19:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

• OK, I see, no problem. Thank you for your opinion! --Basotxerri (talk) 20:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Before and after, the photo is very OK. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

• No, IMO it was better the other way, and this edit bothers me. I will consider whether to change my vote or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Reverted to the old version, according to the demands of the market. Anyway, it's possible that I'll withdraw the image because it seems that people think that it's not so good as I thought it was. Thanks for your opinion! --Basotxerri (talk) 09:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose No, sorry, this is not a goof pic. Its maybe sharp (like people here love to see a pic) but its not a photograph:-)Paolobon140 (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Basotxerri (talk) 21:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)