Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garibaldi Lake seen from Panorama Ridge.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Garibaldi Lake seen from Panorama Ridge.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2022 at 01:52:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Garibaldi Lake seen from Panorama Ridge; all by --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Excellent quality for what if I'm not mistaken is a cellphone pic, but not one of the greatest photos on the site. We see regions of oversharpening and unsharpness that don't look good at larger sizes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)- Oppose per Ikan. Nice scene but technically not quite there. BigDom (talk) 20:31, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Weak support a nice scene but I don't like how the clouds are cut off. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)- Support This is a lens camera with its own sensor that is clamped to the mobile phone and then controlled with it. The photographer did not reveal how many shots he used to compose the picture. Unfortunately, the Exif does not give any information about the lens used. The quality is ok for this kind of equipment.--Ermell (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment: used 4 frames for this version; added a single frame alternative. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Weak oppose The clouds in the right seem to have strange, greenish hue, IMO. Nice composition. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)- Oppose per Ikan. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info: a single frame version for more consistent quality. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support This is much better, but the crop spoils the composition. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm really sorry but neither version is FP to me. They are very beautiful in terms of composition and colours but the level of detail preserved is not FP, it feels both oversharpened and undetailed at full size Cmao20 (talk) 12:14, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao 20. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
