Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galtür - Jamtal 01.jpg

File:Galtür - Jamtal 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2017 at 15:16:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Galtür - Jamtal 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galtür - Jamtal 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
•  Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very well composed. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I feel like I'm falling off a mountainside!! PumpkinSky talk 17:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per PumpkinSky. :) --cart-Talk 17:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. -- Pofka (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful forms and light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support OK ... I think we may have finally found the image that goes with David Arkenstone's "Valley in the Clouds". Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose so far.The halos around the fir tree tops are a result of a not very careful reduction of the highlights. That should be fixed IMO. The composition deserves it.--Ermell (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I hadn't paid attention to that before, but when you look for it, it's very apparent. Do fix that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Done @Ermell: @Ikan Kekek: I've uploaded a version developped from the scratch, I've prepared highlights and shadows in a less aggressive way, however as a side effect some of the dynamic range is lost. Anyway, I think it's still good enough. If anybody wants to object, please let me know. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

• I miss the brightness on the nearest hillside that slopes up to the right. For my taste, I'd love some kind of compromise, but I'm in no position to insist and won't change my support vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Done This is really fine tuning now. I think it's a bit better now. Ikan, what do you think? --Basotxerri (talk) 18:54, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

• I agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it's just too unsharp for me. At full res (14 MP) the fine details are clearly smudged, but even at 3 MP the details look more like fine brushstrokes in a painting than real vegetation. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose looks overprocessed to me, washed out details. --Ivar (talk) 18:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol