Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galapagos land iguana 01.jpg

File:Galapagos land iguana 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2018 at 19:13:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Galapagos land iguana 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galapagos land iguana 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
•  Info created by Bgag - uploaded by Bgag - nominated by Bgag -- Bgag (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bgag (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose not FP in sharpness, exposure or composition. Charles (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Going with Charles here. It's good, I'm just not so sure it's great.--Peulle (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Sharpness of the head is good. Composition has strong points and weak points. The crop is a bit clumsy, but the front leg with that human-shaped hand is interesting. Ok for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

• Not human-shaped. Reptiles do not have opposable thumbs like primates. Charles (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

• Though I wear similar gloves to do the washing up :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad Angle, composition --The Photographer 02:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support Considering the other criticisms, I like the textures enough to forgive the shallow DoF. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Sharp enough for me, nice subject, and I find the composition good enough, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per Daniel Case. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 17:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral The subject is interesing, but I know the place and it is pretty easy to photograph these iguanas. I agree with The Photographer about the angle and I also believe that the image is too small, detail is not bad but this level of detail (same species) would be really a plus to me. --Poco² 08:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)