Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2016 at 22:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
- Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Question - Is this different from the photo that was very recently considered? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Responding to myself for now: I believe so. I think the car is further up, but otherwise, the picture is quite similar. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I Support featuring this photo. Some people may prefer it to the other one because the cable car is more clearly lit, but I predict that we'll get the same complaints about the shadow, and that it probably won't be featured. And as before, I like the contrast of the lighted area and the area in shadow, but nevertheless clearly visible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support I like both. No doubt for me. If someone don´t like the shadows, he has to wait until June. But there will be no or just a little snow on the mountains. --Hubertl 11:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral since it's an excellent image, but too similar to the other one for me to support. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Still don't care for the shadows, and still don't see what's so special about a plain old cable car. INeverCry 23:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral Shadow don't disturbing me much provided it is from the mountain at the top. For me there are just to many people on the slope. But I cannot decide if it is a reason to decline it. --Hockei (talk) 09:03, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is good but I am not convinced about composition and lighting and not moved by the subject itself Poco2 08:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport