Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenstein Kraig Kirchweg 6 Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T 14082017 0358.jpg

File:Frauenstein Kraig Kirchweg 6 Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T 14082017 0358.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 12:10:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenstein Kraig Kirchweg 6 Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T 14082017 0358.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenstein Kraig Kirchweg 6 Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T 14082017 0358.jpg

1685

671

572

540

7360

4912

dust spot

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- PumpkinSky talk 12:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 18:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support It is a church. A perfect picture of a church. Wow? Hard to say, not really spectacular, I would say. But it is close to a perfect shot. Can it be done better? As long as this shall be an encyclopedic picture, that would be hard I guess. Therefore, FP is the right status for this picture. --Sputniktilt (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for your specific review and assessment. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per Sputniktilt. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning HalfGig talk 23:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - If the votes for this one weren't so overwhelming, I would be a stinker and oppose this one, too. I think the idea of a church emerging from the trees is a good one, but to complete the form, I'd like a cloud over the church, and I mention this in case you have a chance to take another photo on a mostly sunny day when there's a cloud or two in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

• Whenever there is a chance, I am going to fulfill your wish for a photo that meets your taste of a brisk cloudy sky of blue, white and perhaps some shades of grey. For the moment I thank you for your honest review and stimulation. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Same dust spot as above... I tend to agree with Sputniktilt first part of comments. --Jebulon (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Sorry for the dustspot. In the meanwhile it was being removed. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 14:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings