Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fraser valley viewed from Sumas Mountain.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Fraser valley viewed from Sumas Mountain.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2021 at 03:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Fraser valley viewed from Sumas Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment Beautiful thumbnail but hazy and too noisy, IMO, at full size. Can you do anything about the noise/artifacts? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Done: denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks. The sky is better, though there are still darker dots in it, but I don't think the rest of it is FP-level with the remaining artifacts, and I consider panoramas to be fairly judged by looking at full size at this kind of scale. I'm afraid I'll have to oppose unless there's a way to redevelop the photo and get rid of the rough-looking artifacts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Done: applied different algorithms, I think that took care of the artifacts. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, very big improvement. I'm going to live with this photo a little bit and see if I can come to a decision. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support At thumbnail it looks too hazy for FP, but viewing it in full size I think it's a really interesting panorama. Good composition and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment WB is too blue/green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Done: made warmer. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Por image quality: postereized, no detail, seems overprocessed. Alvesgaspar (talk) 03:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)- Comment At 100 percent view, there’s considerable loss of detail, the woods in the background are completely posterized. Colour banding in the sky, look overprocessed. On the other hand, we are pixelpeeping on a frame of 32 megapixels so it might be usable for printing despite of the shortcomings. --Kreuzschnabel 16:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Too strong chromatic noise in the mountains, in my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 18:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Generally overprocessed, per others. Didn't even get to the mountains before reaching that conclusion. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 08:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
