Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Franz Xaver Winterhalter Family of Queen Victoria.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Franz Xaver Winterhalter Family of Queen Victoria.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2016 at 02:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
- Info created by Franz Xaver Winterhalter - uploaded by Firebrace - nominated by Firebrace -- Firebrace (talk) 02:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Firebrace (talk) 02:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice but a few small --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Much too small for a painting of this size. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small.--Jebulon (talk) 16:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment What is going on here? It's 2.8m pixels, 40% larger than necessary to qualify... Firebrace (talk) 19:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Do you think that if you exceed 2MP for a painting that you automatically get a gold star. Let's do away with voting then! This is about "finest". We probably have hundreds of thousands of photos of paintings that are 2MP or more. Why is this among our very best? -- Colin (talk) 22:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Strawman argument. The image is being voted down because it is "too small", not for any other reason... Firebrace (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- And that's a perfectly valid reason. You haven't offered any reasons why this is among our finest, or has any wow. -- Colin (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Strawman argument. The image is being voted down because it is "too small", not for any other reason... Firebrace (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Do you think that if you exceed 2MP for a painting that you automatically get a gold star. Let's do away with voting then! This is about "finest". We probably have hundreds of thousands of photos of paintings that are 2MP or more. Why is this among our very best? -- Colin (talk) 22:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment What is going on here? It's 2.8m pixels, 40% larger than necessary to qualify... Firebrace (talk) 19:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 21:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Jebuon.-- Colin (talk) 22:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Colin and others. --Hubertl 17:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results: