Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fondaco dei Turchi e Museo di Storia naturale Venezia notte.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Fondaco dei Turchi e Museo di Storia naturale Venezia notte.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2016 at 18:41:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment I try to see, what did these 40 MPx cameras invent. I didnt see one single sharp photo of 40 MPx, neither use of it. But they exist. Merely here, like in others - your lens cant capture sensor. Any option for some normal size and quality ? --Mile (talk) 20:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- ????????????--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Neutral - I waver a little on this photo. It's a very nice, picturesque photo featuring a pretty building at night over water. It's certainly a Quality Image and a Valued Image if nominated for both. I like it better than your Quality Image of a similar view on a gray day; here is a good Valued Image, but you could always nominate this one in the scope of a night picture of this building. And for a night picture of a building, the star trails aren't too traily. But is it one of the most outstanding photos on the site? That gives me pause. I think that perhaps this is just a very good Quality Image. So arguably, since I have doubts about a "wow", I should vote against, but I don't feel negatively about the photo, so for now, I'll be neutral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)- Neutral per Ikan. While normally I vote neutral only when I think the image could be supportable if an issue is addressed, here is one of those instances where I'm just on the fence. Ikan says it best—I can think of neither a good reason to support or oppose here. Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
