Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fiore di tarassaco o dente di leone.jpg

File:Fiore di tarassaco o dente di leone.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2020 at 08:52:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fiore di tarassaco o dente di leone.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fiore di tarassaco o dente di leone.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Family_:_Asteraceae_(Sunflowers)
•  Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by PROPOLI87 -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not sharp enough, especially since this is such a common flower. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

the fact that the flower is common and that it is not interesting for you does not mean that it is an important plant for its medicinal qualities. As for the image, it was promoted as a quality image in which I had participated as recommended here. However I accept your judgment.PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

QI is not enough reason to promote this as an FP though. FP has a more strict standard of quality than QI. pandakekok9 10:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

• Who said the plant is not interesting to me? I like dandelions. Pay attention to what people say. A common plant needs a truly outstanding photo to be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I understand now. I'll try again. Now I can only photograph flowers and plants in my garden because of the quarantine for Covid-19, but I will take pictures of beautiful panoramas as soon as they take us out of the house. Best wishes from Italy.PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

I understand. I live in New York! Stay safe and healthy! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose - per Ikan Kekek --Adámoz (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The stamens are not sharp; the standards for flower FPs are very high.--Peulle (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Probably deserves QI but Ikan is unfortunately right that this is not sharp enough for FP. I agree that this is an important plant but the trouble is there are dandelions to be found in loads of gardens and it's not difficult to produce a high quality photo of one. This doesn't stand out - compare to this FP of a dandelion which is sharper and better composed. Cmao20 (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

I accept the judgment of all of you, because it serves to improve, but I thought that the fact of having passed the IQ, made it a quality photo. Then the fact that it is not considered suitable I understand and accept it. I will try again here, I do not give up easily despite your negative judgments. I have many photos that have already passed the IQ exam. See you next time!PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

It is good to hear that you will not give up. Most of us have made a long journey with more 'opposes' than we like to remember before we started to get our FPs. :-) --Cart (talk) 13:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Of course! In life never give up! Thanks Kart!And this time I managed to do the application correctly! It is already an improvement for me! Best wishes! PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)