Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Finnair Airbus A319-112 OH-LVL snowfall.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Finnair Airbus A319-112 OH-LVL snowfall.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2017 at 10:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Lentokonefani -- Lentokonefani (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Support As nominator -- Lentokonefani (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment When it comes to technical aspects, this probably isn't the best photo out there, but in my opinion the snowfall looks cool enough for this to be an FP. I'm no expert when it comes to photography, though, so let's see what others think. -- Lentokonefani (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Weak support Striking! But yes, the image quality is not so good - it's very rare for me to be voting support on a picture taken with a point-and-shoot. Small sensor and slow lens = noise, even at ISO 100. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Quality is fine for me: It looks like a plane landing in a very heavy snowstorm. There is what looks like a very small dust spot under the plane about half way between the wings and the back, so that's worth investigating and if it is a dust spot, cleaning. Otherwise, though, I have no problem with this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Well spotted. I think it was a dust spot. Fixed it. --Lentokonefani (talk) 13:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very good photo taken under diffucilt circumstances --Michielverbeek (talk)!
- Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose The quality is really not good (grainy, unsharp), I also don't find it wow enough to neglect quality issues. Yes, an airplane landing in snowfall, so what? May the author and supporters pardon me, but for me it's not amongst the very best of Commons.. --A.Savin 14:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)- Oppose per A.Savin regarding technical quality, which is a pity as I do find it an interesting photo. I have no inherent objection to supporting photos taken with point-and-shoot cameras, but this particular image is very grainy at the expense of actual detail. Sorry, –Juliancolton | Talk 16:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Julian. Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a great composition and had it been taken with a better camera it would have been a slam-dunk. The technical quality is unfortunately too low. Also, I don't find the circumstances that difficult, taking photos during snowfall is done all the time where I live. --cart-Talk 20:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Compact camera on terrible weather and faster exposition, I can't imagine how this picture could be better taking in consideration the moment conditions. Featured Images is more than just a perfect taken image, Featured Images is more than just have the last camera model, FP is to be in the perfect moment observing incredible things creating wonderful compositions and IMHO it's the case --The Photographer 23:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support as per The Photographer. --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Agreed; there is more to this image than noise and a point-and-shoot camera. WClarke 18:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support I have never seen such an image before so the wow factor compensates for the low quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and good. -- Spurzem (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose nice, but the quality (incl. chromatic abberation: red edges) isn't ok for a FP image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
