Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fashion designer in St Louis in Senegal (croped).jpg

File:Fashion designer in St Louis in Senegal (croped).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2016 at 17:49:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fashion designer in St Louis in Senegal (croped).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fashion designer in St Louis in Senegal (croped).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Mariememissiaen - uploaded by Mariememissiaen - nominated and cropped by Rodrigo.Argenton -- -- RTA 17:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support We also need a better description, I cropped the original version, that have too much negative space, and some distractions, unfortatly I didn't found a crop good enough capable to include the fabric. -- -- RTA 17:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm sure you won't be surprised that I don't like all that blur in either version. I haven't decided yet whether to oppose on that basis. The original version has a better composition, though, and I don't see the advantage of the crop except on the left side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

  Ikan Kekek better composition? Come on... and this you have the focus on the man. -- RTA 18:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

• The man and his garment is better to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose The crop loses the garment. It is an environmental portrait, so the dodgy wiring is part of it. -- Colin (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Alternative - the original version

Just for those who may like it...

•  Comment I suggest a crop. See note. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Arion I tried that before, however look the woman behind th fabric... -- RTA 20:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's useful but not a great portrait, mainly because of the angle chosen. There's no dynamic to this perpendicular shot, so the subject looks like he's frozen. If we were more facing him and higher up then the image would have more energy, and we'd see the fabric he is working on. -- Colin (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral I do prefer this crop, but there is an apparent dust spot on the inside left forearm that I cannot note because it's within the large area already annotated (Or at least I don't know how) that I would like to see removed before I register my !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support this uncrop version is better i believe, if you corp the left side and make it more like the first one. Speaks more than the crop version. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 18:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)