Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Famiglia Mancini, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

File:Famiglia Mancini, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2017 at 16:49:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Famiglia Mancini, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Famiglia Mancini, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info All by -- The Photographer 16:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Very visually striking. If you tried sharpening it further, would that ruin the photo? I ask because I don't know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

I rollbacked the noise reduction, let me know if it is more sharpen for you :) --The Photographer 17:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Much more uniform now. Before, there were places that were noisy and/or unsharp. Now, it's all noisy. :-) It's quite an interesting photo, though. I'll live with it and see how I react to it later. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I might've liked to have seen the full fountain, but visually striking and very colorful nonetheless. lNeverCry 18:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, do you have a picture with the full fountain? It looks a bit odd Charles (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done Charles and Ikan Kekek --The Photographer 18:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Ordinarily I might find this cluttered, but in this case I love the contrasting warm and cool colors. I will also forgive the noise because if it took ISO 4000 to make this work, that's what it took. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely clutter! So this is what your new camera can do. :) You are off to a good start. --cart-Talk 23:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

This camera is actually amazing, however, maybe this picture is not the better example (this picture was taken in low light conditions and without tripod). I was walking over the street and I saw that beautiful shoot in a restaurant. There are some things I still can not understand in the camera, however, I'm slowly learning. The camera is considerably lighter and its small appearance hides a great power. I must confess that I feel like an 8 year old boy receiving a gift --The Photographer 11:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose too noisy, and the focus seems to be wrong, in the back wall, not in the middle, or in fountain, the framing is not good, the lack of the bottom of the fountain creates a weirdness, and you could go to 1/18 s hand-held with this lens... The method to sharping was not good, highly increased the noise in a very noisy picture. There is CR in the mirror, and other artifacts in almost all lamps. And in the edges have distortions referent to the 18mm lens. Most of it you can improve.

And this is a opinion, I would prefer a restaurant in service, crowd, with people, movement, especially a cantina.

Keep shooting. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 00:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nice idea!, let me print 40 pages of forms to ask permission for each people in the restaurant --The Photographer 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Just like you request for the homeless? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 20:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support convincing and well executed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Reluctantly, now that composition is good - it's just too grainy (check out the table on the left). Charles (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Actually, I think you got the NR about right the first time (perhaps could go a little less) but removed too much of it now and so noise is quite visible without really gaining any sharpness or detail. While NR can removed detail, sometimes there just isn't any more to get, and I find the original sharp enough. Is there any chance to take a photo with a tripod? I'd prefer a version with more NR, closer to to your first version (though with the full fountain). But as a whole, the image is great. -- Colin (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Dear Colin, thanks for your noise critique. I asked permission to take a photograph, however, it was not allowed to use a tripod. I had only one opportunity to make this photo before the people arrived. BTW, I applied more NR, please, let me know what do you think. --The Photographer 13:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Generally the new version is a good balance between the original and the noisier one. For example, the striped shirt of the man in the mirror is better defined than the first version. However, the map seems to have lost some detail compared to other versions. It's not a big deal, but I know you like to get it right. -- Colin (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Excellent critique, let me see how improve it this weekend. I love your critiques (support or oppose) because you not only show me the problem, you are trying to explain me how fix it. Thanks a lot. --The Photographer 19:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

@Colin: I rollbacked to the first version adding the bottom (recomendation by Charlesjsharp) and sharpening (recomendation by Ikan Kekek) --The Photographer 16:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

 Comment - I think this is probably the best version, overall, but there are some disconcertingly smudgy areas on the fountain, and while the composition is definitely interesting, I'm not totally convinced by it. Therefore, I'm glad you took this photo, but I will remain neutral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - We can play NR/sharpening tug-of-war until the cows come home but on the whole, it's a fine image. I think this is one of those cases others have been talking about recently where you've missed the point if you're measuring noise at 100% magnification in a shadow in a corner. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Grainy --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --anghy (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much denoising and resharpening--Ermell (talk) 08:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer 02:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors