Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 13.jpg

File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 13.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 20:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 13.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 13.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Belluno
•  Info created and uploaded by kallerna| - nominated by KennyOMG -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I know, the trees, the trees. First off I think they help bring the monumentality in perspective. Second, and more importantly, the tree on the left closes the view that would otherwise be a boring roll off of the hillside, or worse, a cut into the rocks like in the panorama version. My only gripe is the clouds don't cast a shadow on one of the peaks. Can't have 'em all. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Info This one might be the answer. —kallerna (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Funny how when I put them next to each other I feel like the trees in the foreground add more to the picture than the shadow that I was missing. Also funny how all of us (assumed) are always hunting vantage points where nothing impedes the view but sometimes it works out better with a bit of distraction in the frame. In any case thank you for the link but I'm even happier with my pick for this FP nom than I was before. :) -- KennyOMG (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Question Is the gap I marked really there?--Ermell (talk) 07:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Info Definitely a stiching error. I made a new merge, should be fixed now. —kallerna (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support As far as I can tell, this is a single frame not a stitched panorama, so the gap is presumably there in reality. I actually like the panorama version better, but yes, this is FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 09:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• Ah. Fair enough. Better resolution now, too. Cmao20 (talk) 07:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support-- Seven Pandas (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 04:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm liking the composition, but in this one, too, I think you could smooth out the gradations in the sky somewhat. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Info Smoothened the sky a bit, maybe better now? —kallerna (talk) 11:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

• Yes. So sorry for being indecisive. I will definitely look again in the coming days. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support This time's the charm. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 04:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Belluno