Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fallas2017 18 Museo Fallero.jpg

File:Fallas2017 18 Museo Fallero.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2021 at 14:07:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fallas2017 18 Museo Fallero.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fallas2017 18 Museo Fallero.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Spain
•  Info created & uploaded by Rafesmar - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, nothing special here, a cropped figure and nothing else Ezarateesteban 17:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm undecided, but I disagree with this review. I find this a striking and unusual viewpoint, and the background is not nothing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose I actually find the composition interesting, and the colors are really nice. For me, though, to get away with this kind of composition I want the main subject to be more in focus. More DoF in general I think would help here, but a nice idea/motif. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK shot. Could be croped on rigth side - glass. --Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Striking composition. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Only if croped on rigth side. --Gnosis (talk) 00:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Frank --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition seems unbalnced. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Rhododendrites' points are well taken, but I ultimately come down on the side of the statue being sharp enough, and the composition works very well for me. It's sometimes worthwhile to feature photos that are a little offbeat and atypical. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
•  weak oppose per Rhododendrites. --Ivar (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Rhododendrites, noise. Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
•  weak oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)