Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Exposure ('De hurkende man') Lelystad. 07-03-2022. (d.j.b) 04.jpg

File:Exposure ('De hurkende man') Lelystad. 07-03-2022. (d.j.b) 04.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2022 at 16:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Exposure ('De hurkende man') Lelystad. 07-03-2022. (d.j.b) 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Exposure ('De hurkende man') Lelystad. 07-03-2022. (d.j.b) 04.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
•  Info Exposure ('The squatting man') Artwork by Antony Gormley. Location: Markerstrekdam, Lelystad. (Experimental color processing.)
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment WB seems very green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per FP guideines on "Digital manipulations". You need to declare on the file description page that this has had a colour filter / processing-effect applied to it. (we don't require that for b&w because that's so obvious, but here the viewer might wonder if there had been some strange pollution in the sky that day.) Ideally, I'd recommend the filename mentioned this too, just to avoid someone picking it accidentally. I see you have this image which is similar and with natural processing. I'm not really seeing the point of the colour processing here, especially since you had perfectly lovely weather. -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you for your comment. I would have done this edit as an experiment, but maybe it was a bit overconfident.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Regardless of its success/failure at FPC, you should still add a "retouched" template or similar, per our educational purpose. -- Colin (talk) 18:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Oppose I'm not really seeing FP in this 9MP image of a huge sculpture, which seems much like a photo anyone might take on a sunny day there. The angle isn't best (compare your 01 photo where you can see the feet and head better). The detail and lighting aren't wowing me. -- Colin (talk) 18:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

• Yeah, I'm not so sure about this photo, but I would support the one linked by Colin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Support edit only, the white balance does seem too green to me in the other one. This one maybe doesn't have outstanding light but it's nice and sunny and the quality of the motif outweighs it, sometimes 'I want to see this interesting place featured' is enough when the photo is also good quality and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin; might work centered but like this feels a little unbalanced for no real reason. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment With this photo I wanted to let the lock complex come out from under the man's seat.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Support per Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 06:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)