Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Expedition 41 Rollout (201409230006HQ).jpg

File:Expedition 41 Rollout (201409230006HQ).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2014 at 20:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Expedition 41 Rollout (201409230006HQ).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Expedition 41 Rollout (201409230006HQ).jpg

297

173

249

442

3919

2074

Excessive/badly masked noise reduction?

55

1473

885

235

3919

2074

Washed out texture due to excessive NR??

•  Info created by NASA/Joel Kowsky - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 -- Ras67 (talk) 20:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Info Soyuz TMA-14M is rolled out to the launch pad on Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2014.
•  Support This image draws a line from the past (the abandoned facilities and surrounded scrap) to present (the time-honoured, polished Soyuz, the police helicopters and car, the fire engine) and future (research by the Expedition 41 members, which were transported to the ISS by this rocket). -- Ras67 (talk) 20:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Highly interesting, but for me several problems: Masts in BG loook weird and so does some annotated vegetation. Maybe noise reduction has been applied too agressively and/or not properly masked. I think the left hand side crop is too tight, and regarding the right hand side the lonely car there should either have had a bit more space or be cropped out - a lot of things are already happening, and it is all a bit confusing. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

No way a D4 needs that much NR at ISO 250. Probably a combination of haze and suboptimal dof at 200mm and f/4.5, really an issue on full format. --DXR (talk) 20:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I think this is heat turbulence, on the masts due to distance (probable several kilometers), on the vegetation due to the locomotive's hot fume. For me the picture is a puzzle with many things to explore include the lonely police car. --Ras67 (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Great and very interesting photo with wow. I don't really mind the limited DOF here and the main subject is in focus.--ArildV (talk) 11:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Definitely important and historic, but that doesn't make it an FP, between the noted technical flaws and composition that makes me unclear about what the subject of the photo is. Daniel Case (talk) 01:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uninteresting composition. What in this pic is intended to be the subject? --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 03:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jee 02:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)