Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Escale à Sète 2022 D.jpg

File:Escale à Sète 2022 D.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 10:31:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Escale à Sète 2022 D.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Escale à Sète 2022 D.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral (for now) I noticed it on Flickr. Very nice one but maybe slightly over "clarified" - Benh (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You are right on the fact that there is "some" clarity :), as the clarity level is at +80 with Lightromm. But I don't plan to decrease it as I actually like it like that. However thanks you for the comment. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Then I'm very sorry but that's an  Oppose for me :( Very beautiful picture, but the clarity trigger was pushed too far to my tastes. - Benh (talk) 09:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Possibly over-saturated, but the light is special, and the composition great in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support, without prejudice to any edits that might be made to the white balance, etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support A very French photo Cmao20 (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support – a very colourful photo. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Great atmosphere and light. --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support For the record: I'm convinced that even a completely unrealistic post card perfect style edit can, in principle, be a FP - if it's done well. This is not one of those images, though. Content-wise it's a really cool mix of post card idyll (ship, lighting, reflections) and the "real" world (cracked walls, wires, air conditioning, antennas ...). With that in mind, the editing is hitting just the right spot between a neutral, bland, don't-you-dare-touching-that-saturation-slider style image and 500px. --El Grafo (talk) 09:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Slight perspective issue at the right, but it doesn't have to be rectified. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451647 09:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colours and compo Poco a poco (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Hulged (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships