Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 184-186 HDR.jpg

File:Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 184-186 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2023 at 16:09:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 184-186 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 184-186 HDR.jpg

2919

862

1654

264

5560

4350

this must be horizontal

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
•  Info Night view of some of the buildings in Grand-Place, central square of Brussels, Belgium. From left to right: Maison du Mont Thabor (nr. 12, rebuilt in 1699 and restored in 1885), Maison de la Rose or "The Rose" (nr. 11, rebuilt in 1702 and restored in 1901), L'Arbre d'Or or "The Golden Tree" (nr. 10, built in 1696 and restored in 1901), Le Cygne or the "Swan House" (nr. 9, rebuilt in 1698 and restored between 1896 and 1904) and L'Étoile or "The Star" (nr. 8, rebuilt in 1695 and 1897). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks a bit squashed. The right side seems overcorrected to me.--Ermell (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Great lighting but the margins are very tight on both sides -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
• I see, thank you for your feedback. Will update a new version this evening (CET) and try you adress your issues. Poco a poco (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

• @Ermell, Basile Morin, and Iifar: I've reworked the image from scratch, it looks IMHO indeed better now. It doesn't feel "squashed" and there is more margin on both sides. Ivar: the 3 buildings on the laft are on a plane, but between the third (building nr. 10 here) and the fourth (building nr. 9) there is an angle, therefore you cannot expect horizontal to be horizontal from the POV of the camera. Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

•  Neutral Now it looks good but I find the junk and the blurred people too disturbing to give a pro.--Ermell (talk) 19:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support This version is fine in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral distortion too strong for my taste. -- Ivar (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Not the easiest shot to make, and improvements helped. Still, could do something about that curlicue at the left of the roofline—it's got this weird halo. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Works for me. I see what Daniel is saying about a halo, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

• Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek:  Done Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium