Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ebenthal Gurnitz Propstei und Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin 06032015 0283.jpg

File:Ebenthal Gurnitz Propstei und Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin 06032015 0283.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 14:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ebenthal Gurnitz Propstei und Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin 06032015 0283.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ebenthal Gurnitz Propstei und Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin 06032015 0283.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 19:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Judging by the other pictures, they have recently replaced the roof. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 07:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

* Support - What part of liberal sites like this one are relevant to the wheels turning in D.C. Don't believe it: If you're a DC resident, call their many number. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC) - I didn't post this bullshit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

 Comment @Ikan Kekek: did you accidentally paste in text from somewhere else? Daniel Case (talk) 15:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

+1? I asked at his talk page... --cart-Talk 17:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

No. It looks like someone somehow impersonated me. I don't know how they did it, because they also made it look like I actually did it, if you see the history. I'm not sure what to do about this. I'm going to log out and change my password, but I hope no-one is keylogging me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• Weak  Support Nice lighting, quality and composition. The cemetery is though not visible from this angle, I'd remove that cat from the file.. I mean weak support because there are still better views of this subject IMHO, like this one of yours. --Poco² 18:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
• Moderate  Support - OK, this is actually me, evaluating this picture for the first time. I agree with Poco, but I don't see the cat! Where is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Ikan, I mean the category "Cemeteries in Ebenthal in Kärnten" in the file. Poco² 20:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Oh, that kind of cat. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
      • Your reasoning is conclusive, Diego. I removed the cemetery category. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support PumpkinSky talk 22:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 22:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me the composition is unbalanced; the church is too high in the frame. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like the photo including the position of the church. HalfGig talk 01:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not special enough, church partially hidden. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings