Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Donauuferbahn-Oberleitung-DSC 5892w.jpg

File:Donauuferbahn-Oberleitung-DSC 5892w.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2014 at 00:47:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Donauuferbahn-Oberleitung-DSC 5892w.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Donauuferbahn-Oberleitung-DSC 5892w.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- P e z i (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 14:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice silhouette, nice sunset but ... I have no idea what I'm looking at and why it's important. So I look at the image and see it's supposed to have something to do with a rail line in Vienna. OK, what does it tell me about the rail line that serves to illustrate useful information that might be imparted in an encyclopedic article (something which this image is currently not used for at all)? Also, frankly, as an image itself it's just too cluttered, between the stuff on the tower and the wires running across it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is the Overhead_line#Tensioning, a very essential part of a power cable. I think the structures and details are even better visible in this silhoutte than in an ordinary picture. It's not in use because I've uploaded it recently. (And generally I think there is a trade off between wow and encyclopedic value.) --P e z i (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support /St1995 19:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel Case. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 11:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

• The opponents convinced me, I change to  Neutral Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 04 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Daniel. and no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose somewhat per Daniel Case. It doesn't look impressively beautiful to me. The composition is ok for an encyclopedic shot but nothing special artistically and I think that would be the only basis on which this could work as fp. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Leitoxx 15:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)