Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome).jpg

File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2016 at 08:50:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - The lights are blown, but that's the tradeoff you made to get a beautiful picture of the rest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 20:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've never been there but a little google imaging suggests the color is off toward cold tones. - Benh (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

• Besides that the colors are just perfect, and if you want to be credible put the photos that prove the contrary, is very curious (I wonder why) that Benh (and some others) come out on my nominations always and just see to vote in opposition, I wonder why... --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• Thought you could query Google yourself but here you go. - Benh

With all due respect, Benh, but I kicked the FPX now. You have had your vote and you used it. Use FXP, when something is obviously and unrepairable against the guidelines. --Hubertl 17:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• •  Comment It is not necessary - and against the guidelines too - to be dismissive. To anyone here! --Hubertl 17:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
    • He goes paranoiac, makes allegations on my voting pattern (my commentary is justified and with a neutral tone) and I'm dismissive... Hmmm. Double check before giving a lesson. Back to photo, yes, the off balance is quite a huge mistake IMO. Colour accuracy is also a criteria, but it seems under rated because it's not as obvious as, say, sharpness to spot out. U r right on the FPX, mine wasn't valid, as other support votes were provided. My mistake. - Benh (talk) 18:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
      • No Benh, the paranoid is someone who connects only to give negative votes to the same people .....need to be balanced in life. You're not far. You gave me a positive vote? Show me that please. Returning to the photo, this makes you feel you not me. The colors are OK --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)