Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dlieja Sacun apostul apsis a man dreta.jpg

File:Dlieja Sacun apostul apsis a man dreta.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2019 at 16:56:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dlieja Sacun apostul apsis a man dreta.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dlieja Sacun apostul apsis a man dreta.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media#Religion
•  Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Immense resolution makes this to my mind a great candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --BoothSift 22:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support —Eatcha (Talk-Page) 04:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 07:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support but I would like to learn more about this fresco, e.g. when it has been painted --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for the support. It's all in the description Leonhard von Brixen --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

• Nevertheless, if you know the year of composition, add it to the file description. If not, I think it's sufficiently explanatory. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: There exist no documents about the paintings but only attributions (second half of the 15th century). I found out that it depicts the apostel Saint James the lesser. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

• OK, then the description you've given is sufficient. Thanks, Wolfgang. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I hope it's acceptable to oppose just because I find him ugly. – Lucas 17:36, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - IMO, yes, because that goes to "no wow". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

• If you’d support it, I should say the world is coming to its end. He might be ugly, but to me he is cosy and this fresco imho is ways, ages, miles more beautiful than this junk (pardon me!) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

• Easy! He said he found the man depicted ugly, not that he found your photograph ugly for any other reason. In my humble opinion, it would be best if you backed off and tried not to make this personal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment In fact, I din't mean the photos but the objects --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

• So describing the things I photograph as junk is fair game, but any timid comment against the unquestionable beauty of anything in front of your lens is sacrilege, of course ... Nur die Ruhe, whatever I write it's only one vote of many and not worth this amount of bickering. – Lucas 10:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

• @Lucasbosch: and @Moroder: I just wanted to point out that calling the objects in each other's photos ugly is not an insult to the each other but to the creator/designer, even if they don't see this. --BoothSift 02:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support. Vulphere 16:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support A fine image of an important motif. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Religion