Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DeepDream SchillerGym 20210821 Hof04021 RAW 202109251094CROP.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:DeepDream SchillerGym 20210821 Hof04021 RAW 202109251094CROP.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2021 at 10:42:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Other
Info An example of a high-resolution DeepDream image created/uploaded/nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)- Support Something completely different, and I guess we will be completely divided about this one ;–). Well, the LSD freaks would have been happy about a computer program which visualizes parts of their visions, and the QAnon fans and other conspiration theorists will take this as an evidence that Bill Gates now totally manipulates reality ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. An abstract and fascinating work. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks rather strange at full-page size, but you need to pixel peep this for the full effect with all the animal heads, monsters, etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Too strange for me, no enthusiasm, too artificial. The choice of motif appears arbitrary with this technique. I don't see any point in presenting this building like this. The technology itself does not make a FP for me. --Milseburg (talk) 08:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment I like the contrast between the solid, conservative, maybe boring classic German school building and the psychedelic manipulation. That contrast makes the manipulation much more funny for me ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think this meets FP's requirement for non-notable works, that they are "wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art". Since it is possible to apply the algorithm to any image, and tweak the parameters to taste, we potentially have an infinite choice. The high-resolution of this one actually counts against it, as it can only really be "enjoyed" by pixel peeping. The source training data for this example seems to be quite limited (snakes, dogs?) leading to a lot of repetition which gets boring quickly. At a whole-image level, it just looks like someone overlaid an over saturated Paisley pattern. The choice of combining a building, with straight lines, and organic life dreams doesn't work imo. Similarly the combination of pastel coloured building/tree with unpleasantly lurid primary coloured dream spoils the point that one is supposed to get confused between fact and fiction, dream and reality. The best such dream images work at the whole-image level, and where an organic subject is played with by organic imaginary creatures, resulting in one really thinking for a moment that there's a dog here or a bird there. They really do make one think of a nightmare or hallucination. This doesn't do that imo. -- Colin (talk) 08:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Colin. We sometimes need some out-of-the-box photos to shake the system. But this is indeed too much and not particularly aesthetically pleasant. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 19:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)- Weak oppose very interesting, but I'll have to agree with Colin: It's not a very good example of the "genre" because it is so finely grained that I have to magnify it past a full-screen view in order to get the point. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support I'm not sure whether I like it, but I think it is unusual and good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose pe Colin. --Ivar (talk) 16:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 13:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
