Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danubparka fervojo kun Danuba Turo.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Danubparka fervojo kun Danuba Turo.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 22:04:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by darkweasel94 - uploaded by darkweasel94 - nominated by darkweasel94; renominating because the first nomination got no supports, opposes or comments at all -- darkweasel94 22:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Support -- darkweasel94 22:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment Tilted on right-- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- You're right but I think it's more a question of perspective correction than of tilt, because the sign on the ground is not tilted. Question - should I upload it to a new filename and transclude it here? I can't COM:OVERWRITE it because it's already a QI. darkweasel94 11:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. That "revised" guideline (October 2012) introduced the idea of not touching images that are QI/VI/FP. Reading the talk page shows that the issue wasn't fully explored and I disagree with it especially for the uploader fixing issues. I think you should apply IAR and overwrite your file for such a minor thing as rotation. The tower is likely to be vertical whereas road signs are often not. Colin (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, I remember discovering that some of my pictures that were already QI had dust spots on them, so I removed the spots and uploaded directly over. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- OK,
Done, uploaded a new version. darkweasel94 11:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- OK,
- Agreed, I remember discovering that some of my pictures that were already QI had dust spots on them, so I removed the spots and uploaded directly over. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. That "revised" guideline (October 2012) introduced the idea of not touching images that are QI/VI/FP. Reading the talk page shows that the issue wasn't fully explored and I disagree with it especially for the uploader fixing issues. I think you should apply IAR and overwrite your file for such a minor thing as rotation. The tower is likely to be vertical whereas road signs are often not. Colin (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- You're right but I think it's more a question of perspective correction than of tilt, because the sign on the ground is not tilted. Question - should I upload it to a new filename and transclude it here? I can't COM:OVERWRITE it because it's already a QI. darkweasel94 11:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
