Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DFB - RhB R 12 Realp - Tiefenbach II.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:DFB - RhB R 12 Realp - Tiefenbach II.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2022 at 06:53:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Support – Ivar (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)- Support Tomer T (talk) 08:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for nominating this! While I like this photo a lot I also feel like the post processing could be better. It required some quite extreme measures to make sure the snow isn't just all equally white. Hints/Ideas how to improve it are very much appreciated. --Kabelleger (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)- Support --Yann (talk) 12:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support--GRDN711 (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Great, but there's a big spot near the upper left corner that I presume should be removed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've removed that spot. But be aware that it was snowing lightly, hence the photo will always have some spots. I've also changed the white balance quite a bit and made some other adjustments. I think it's better now. --Kabelleger (talk) 22:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Love it (like all your photos I have to say). I think it could have been even more dreamy if it wasn't for the mountain in the background breaking the white "evenness". Since you're asking for feedback, I wonder if you couldn't have made the blacks blacker or emphasize the steam with more clarity to make it a bit scarier... But really just an idea out of the blue. And it's already so good maybe it's best not to alter it :) - Benh (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks! I've already put in a lot of contrast where there originally wasn't much and I'm kind of afraid of pushing it too far and making it look unnatural. Also every time I push contrast I'm increasing noise, and the photo is already quite noisy, so for now I think I'll leave this one as it is, but I have some more photos which could benefit from re-processing and I'll try that on some of them. --Kabelleger (talk) 07:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Wow--Ermell (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. The absence of footprints in this virgin landscape is appreciable -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Certainly the master of the "trains in beautiful places" genre. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 21:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Claus 05:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
