Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Düsseldorf - Gehrybauten5.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Düsseldorf - Gehrybauten5.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2016 at 15:56:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Düssledorf: Neuer Zollhof
  •  Comment - I don't mean to be demanding, but do you plan to crop it a bit closer on the left side, so as to crop out that black tarp? If not, I might reevaluate my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I will for sure not crop because this would be to tight. At most a retouching is appropriate in this case. But if you think the black umbrella is so disturbing please reevaluate your vote. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment I can understand your point of view on the crop, but it's also a little unsharp in the lower left corner (including the "MEERBAR" signs and everything else in the outdoor section of that bar). The photo looks perfectly fine at full-page size. I'm not 100% satisfied with it at full size, but I like the composition except for the black umbrella, which actually isn't bothering me so much anymore. So I don't feel like changing my vote. But do you think you could slightly sharpen the areas of the photo that aren't that sharp? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • For sure it's (a bit) unsharp in the edges, it's a usual optical phenomenon unless you make a elaborate stitching. By the way: this is a stichting, but only of two pictures. But, be honest: depends the quality of a image of each single pixel? And the next point is: giving each part fully sharpness the impression of the main object will be weaken. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • I don't think that making the left of the picture a little clearer at full size will weaken the impression of the Gehry buildings in the slightest, but obviously, you don't want to do it. I disagree (and this is a lot more than a single pixel), but I don't feel impelled to vote against what's otherwise a good photo because of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not really forgotten because of this bug. I have added now the category. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You call it disturbing, I call it framing. It would be not a big deal to retouche it out, but I see no need and no sense. By the way: it's unavoidable if you want to get a frontal and total view of this building. Otherwise you'll get s.th. like this File:Düsseldorf - Am Handelshafen - Neuer Zollhof 04 ies.jpg. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture