Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Düsseldorf - Gehrybauten5.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Düsseldorf - Gehrybauten5.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2016 at 15:56:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support, but please crop out the distracting black tarpaulin in the lower left corner. There are also some places that seem a bit noisy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't mean to be demanding, but do you plan to crop it a bit closer on the left side, so as to crop out that black tarp? If not, I might reevaluate my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I will for sure not crop because this would be to tight. At most a retouching is appropriate in this case. But if you think the black umbrella is so disturbing please reevaluate your vote. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I can understand your point of view on the crop, but it's also a little unsharp in the lower left corner (including the "MEERBAR" signs and everything else in the outdoor section of that bar). The photo looks perfectly fine at full-page size. I'm not 100% satisfied with it at full size, but I like the composition except for the black umbrella, which actually isn't bothering me so much anymore. So I don't feel like changing my vote. But do you think you could slightly sharpen the areas of the photo that aren't that sharp? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- For sure it's (a bit) unsharp in the edges, it's a usual optical phenomenon unless you make a elaborate stitching. By the way: this is a stichting, but only of two pictures. But, be honest: depends the quality of a image of each single pixel? And the next point is: giving each part fully sharpness the impression of the main object will be weaken. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think that making the left of the picture a little clearer at full size will weaken the impression of the Gehry buildings in the slightest, but obviously, you don't want to do it. I disagree (and this is a lot more than a single pixel), but I don't feel impelled to vote against what's otherwise a good photo because of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- For sure it's (a bit) unsharp in the edges, it's a usual optical phenomenon unless you make a elaborate stitching. By the way: this is a stichting, but only of two pictures. But, be honest: depends the quality of a image of each single pixel? And the next point is: giving each part fully sharpness the impression of the main object will be weaken. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I can understand your point of view on the crop, but it's also a little unsharp in the lower left corner (including the "MEERBAR" signs and everything else in the outdoor section of that bar). The photo looks perfectly fine at full-page size. I'm not 100% satisfied with it at full size, but I like the composition except for the black umbrella, which actually isn't bothering me so much anymore. So I don't feel like changing my vote. But do you think you could slightly sharpen the areas of the photo that aren't that sharp? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I will for sure not crop because this would be to tight. At most a retouching is appropriate in this case. But if you think the black umbrella is so disturbing please reevaluate your vote. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't mean to be demanding, but do you plan to crop it a bit closer on the left side, so as to crop out that black tarp? If not, I might reevaluate my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 01:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support well done - including the curious looking building at the right. --Hubertl 14:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Unusual architecture. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support but @Taxiarchos228: it seems you forgot to add categories? --El Grafo (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not really forgotten because of this bug. I have added now the category. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral disturbing rest of a building on right. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- You call it disturbing, I call it framing. It would be not a big deal to retouche it out, but I see no need and no sense. By the way: it's unavoidable if you want to get a frontal and total view of this building. Otherwise you'll get s.th. like this File:Düsseldorf - Am Handelshafen - Neuer Zollhof 04 ies.jpg. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The part of some building on right site of image is disturbing. --Karelj (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support in my eyes the right building not disturb, it's better than a huge area sky. --Ralf Roleček 07:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Gehry Gehry vood! Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per Karelj. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture