Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2019 -- 2790.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2019 -- 2790.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2019 at 22:00:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 22:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Support -- XRay talk 22:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Oppose It doesn't work for me. Perspective, street lamp under the arch, tight crop on the right, cut tree on the left. Dark and experimental but not successful in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sometimes it is really difficult. There are a lot of disturbing elements around the gate. It's not a street lamp, it's the lightning of the gate from the other side. The crop at the left: I used 20 mm focal length, may be other with a fish eye lens. Then you can see the pharmacy on the left, but not the tree. And on the right, you may see a disturbing street sign and another building. --XRay talk 07:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Disturbing elements" are never a good start for a great picture... Now paying more attention to this lightning, it is facing us straight, sending its strong rays in front. That's maybe why it's so embarrassing. And its reflection on the ground is even more agressive, interfering with the rear lights of the car -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortion can be done artfully but it just doesn't work for me here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support IMHO this photo has a real artistic value - I like the placement of street light inside the gate. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and King. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
